It's very rare that you'll find me applauding a government (it only encourages them), but I did think that Kevin ‘07's "sorry" gesture to the stolen generation was the right thing. Sometimes a simple "sorry" can do immense good and in the words of the Indigenous leadership of the time it "enabled the healing to begin".
So how does this relate to superannuation you ask? Quite simply, I am yet to hear a Retail or Industry
Super Fund, their advisers or managers, say "sorry" for the part they
have played in trimming our standard of living in retirement during the recent volatility
and decline in share markets.
Don't get me wrong, I know that there is no crystal ball, but just
as KRudd's gesture started a healing process, some sort of gesture from the
superannuation community might be the catalyst needed to start changing a
system that is clearly flawed. The
trouble is does anyone within the superannuation industry really want to foster
change?
To explain this you need to understand that Superannuation is a
Trust and Superannuation law states that the Trustees have a duty to represent their
members’ interests. This includes making
appropriate independent investment decisions, (including managing risk and insurance)
on behalf of members. In SMSF every
member is a trustee, so trustees are pretty keen to make good investment
decisions because it's their own retirement on the line. For most Retail and Industry funds there is
usually an independently elected Board of Trustees to make the decisions on
behalf of members.
But how impartial are these duly elected Trustees and do they in
fact act in our best interests? Why is
it that no one in the superannuation industry or the Regulator queries the
Board of Trustees when they invest large portions of members’ money in-house? Maybe it’s time for us to ask the tough
question “whose side are the Trustees of my super really on?”
Here is an example, AMP run a superannuation fund called AMP
Superannuation Savings Trust where AMP Superannuation Limited is the Trustee. On behalf of its’ members, the Trustees
research the most appropriate investments to make and can source the investments
or insurance from anywhere they choose that will best benefit the member's retirement,
death or disability. AMP Trustees reported
in the AMP Superannuation Savings Trust Annual Report that they have chosen to invest
a large chunk of the fund's money with AMP Capital Investors and place all the insurance
with AMP Life. So what happened to the
impartial research process then? Is this
really the best decision for members? I
bet the AMP shareholders think this is a great decision.
Why am I singling out AMP?
Well, I'm not. In fact this is
pretty much the standard model used by all fund managers to run Retail Super Funds,
hence the reason why I'm suggesting the system needs to change and why so many disgruntled
people are turning to Self Managed Super.
900,000 Trustees of Self Managed
Super Funds control approximately one third of all superannuation money that
was previously invested in Retail and Industry Funds and who are, according to
the Governments own research, making a pretty good fist of things.
AMP's response has been a sizeable
move into the SMSF space, buying up every Self Managed Superannuation business they
can find in a strategic ‘if you can't beat 'em, join 'em’ move. I recently saw a statement from AMP Financial
Services Chief Executive Craig Meller where he said that to date the Australian
SMSF segment had emerged as something of a "cottage industry" that was
now "ripe for industrialisation". Well I've got news for any large fund manager
who wants to "industrialise" Self Managed Super. Australians are voting with their feet and
moving to SMSF to escape the superannuation "industralisation". Any positive move into the SMSF sector needs
to be accompanied by a very un-industralised "sorry". When that happens the healing might begin.
What
do you think? Post your comments if you feel as strongly about this as
I do or feel free to Contact Us if you want to
have a chat about your superannuation.
No comments:
Post a Comment